
Chipset: Apple A17 Pro (3 nm)
Display: 6.7"
Battery: 4441mAh
Sources: Wikipedia | GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_15_pro_max-12548.php | Wikipedia | GSMArena | Wikipedia | GSMArena
Updated: 3/30/2026

Chipset: Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
Display: 6.9"
Battery: 5000mAh
Sources: GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s26_ultra_5g-14320.php
Updated: 2/27/2026
Comparison controls
Differences only hides identical rows so the table becomes easier to scan on both desktop and mobile.
Highlight winners emphasizes the stronger value in each row without removing the losing phone from view.
Score profiles rebalance the verdict around camera, battery, display, performance, or a balanced read.
Overview
Start with the summary and scorecards, then use the differences toggle to inspect only the rows that can influence a real purchase decision.
Current leader
Galaxy S26 Ultra currently leads based on the selected scoring profile and the available device data.
Best next step
Use Differences Only and the scoring profile switcher to focus the table around your own buying priorities.
Decision framing
Use the category scorecards for a fast read, then validate the raw spec rows before committing.
Trust check
The freshest device data in this matchup was verified 9 days ago.
Galaxy S26 Ultra leads overall versus iPhone 15 Pro Max. Battery: 54.9 vs 78.
Scoring profile: balanced
iPhone 15 Pro Max
Best for users who prioritize build.
Galaxy S26 Ultra
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Value indices are calculated using score per 1,000 USD to show which phone delivers more for the money.
| Metric | iPhone 15 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Budget (price) | $545.00 | $26.00 |
| Price value for budget | 143.12 | 3346.15 |
| Camera for budget | 130.83 | 3030.77 |
| Performance for budget | 149.72 | 3400.00 |
Galaxy S26 Ultra ranks higher for budget
Verdict
Generating honest comparison...
AI summary
Galaxy S26 Ultra generally outperforms iPhone 15 Pro Max across key categories. Display Size: 6.9" vs 6.7" This makes Galaxy S26 Ultra the better choice for most users, though iPhone 15 Pro Max may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize build. iPhone 15 Pro Max offers strong performance in these areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy S26 Ultra excels in processing power and multitasking.
Spec table
Read the summary cards first, then use these grouped rows to confirm the exact differences that can change a buying decision.
Visible rows
45
Meaningful differences
22
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
| Specification | iPhone 15 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Phone B leads | 6.7" | 6.9"Better |
Resolution Phone B leads | 2556 x 1179 | 1440 x 3120Better |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Phone B leads | 2000 nits | 2600 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Phone B leads | 420 ppi | 498 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
Display Protection Needs more data | Ceramic Shield glass | Corning Gorilla Armor 2, Mohs level 6 | DX anti-reflective coating
Privacy Display |
| Specification | iPhone 15 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
RAM Phone B leads | 8GB | 12GBBetter |
CPU Clock Phone B leads | 3.78GHz | 4.74GHzBetter |
CPU Cluster Speeds Phone B leads | 2x3.78GHz + 4x2.11GHz | 2x4.74GHz + 6x3.62GHzBetter |
Storage Close match | 512GB | 512GB |
Storage Type Phone A leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 4.0 |
Chipset Needs more data | Apple A17 Pro (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) |
GPU Needs more data | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) | Adreno 840 |
| Specification | iPhone 15 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Phone B leads | 48MP | 200MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Needs more data | 48MP + 12MP | Not available |
Rear Sensor Size Phone A leads | 1/1.28Better | 1/1.3 |
Rear Aperture Phone B leads | f/1.8 | f/1.4Better |
Optical Zoom Phone A leads | 5xBetter | 3x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Phone B leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video, stereo sound rec. | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Close match | 12MP | 12MP |
Front Aperture Phone A leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EISBetter | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Needs more data | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Laser AF, Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
Community feedback
Long-form breakdown
Choosing between iPhone 15 Pro Max and Galaxy S26 Ultra can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and pricing in Pakistan so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Galaxy S26 Ultra wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better choice overall, winning in 5 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Resolution (Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Peak Brightness (Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Pixel Density (Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), RAM (Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage).
Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers better camera performance overall.
Galaxy S26 Ultra tends to last longer on a charge.
iPhone 15 Pro Max typically ranges from $545.00 to $545.00, while Galaxy S26 Ultra ranges from $26.00 to $26.00.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.