Apple iPhone 17e leads
by 12 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
iPhone 17e leads overall versus Pixel Fold. Software: 91.4 vs 54.3.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 17e
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery.
Google Pixel Fold
Best for users who prioritize camera and display.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
33
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Apple iPhone 17e | Google Pixel Fold |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Google Pixel Fold leads | 6.1" | 7.6"Better |
Resolution Google Pixel Fold leads | 1170 x 2532 | 1840 x 2208Better |
Refresh Rate Google Pixel Fold leads | 60Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Google Pixel Fold leads | 1200 nits | 1450 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Apple iPhone 17e leads | 457 ppiBetter | 378 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Close match | Yes | Yes |
Display Protection Apple iPhone 17e leads | Ceramic Shield 2 | Anti-reflective coatingBetter | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 17e | Google Pixel Fold |
|---|---|---|
RAM Google Pixel Fold leads | 8GB | 12GBBetter |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
CPU Clock Different | 4.26GHz | 2.85GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 6 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x4.26GHz + 4x2.60GHz | 2x2.85GHz + 2x2.35GHz + 4x1.80GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 2187425 | 800000 |
Geekbench (Single) Apple iPhone 17e leads | 3600Better | 1450 |
Geekbench (Multi) Apple iPhone 17e leads | 9296Better | 3600 |
Storage Close match | 512GB | 512GB |
Storage Type Apple iPhone 17e leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Apple iPhone 17e leads | Apple A19 (3 nm)Better | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
GPU Different | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) | Mali-G710 MP7 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 17e | Google Pixel Fold |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 48MP | 48MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Google Pixel Fold leads | 48MP | 48MP + 10.8MP + 10.8MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel Fold leads | 1/2.55 | 1/2Better |
Rear Aperture Apple iPhone 17e leads | f/1.6Better | f/1.7 |
Optical Zoom Google Pixel Fold leads | None (no telephoto) | 5xBetter |
Digital Zoom Different | 10x | 20x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, OIS, stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
Front Camera Apple iPhone 17e leads | 12MPBetter | 9.5MP |
Front Sensor Different | 12MP TrueDepth camera with autofocus | 9.5MP cover camera + 8MP inner camera |
Front Aperture Apple iPhone 17e leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Apple iPhone 17e leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, Dolby Vision HDRBetter | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama, 3D (spatial) audio | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
Generating honest comparison...
iPhone 17e generally outperforms Pixel Fold across key categories. Chipset: Apple A19 (3 nm) vs Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) This makes iPhone 17e the better choice for most users, though Pixel Fold may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery. iPhone 17e excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for photographers and content creators. Pixel Fold offers superior camera capabilities with strong display.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 17e | Google Pixel Fold |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 142,240 | ≈ Rs 123,186 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 17e and Google Pixel Fold can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Apple iPhone 17e scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Apple iPhone 17e is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Refresh Rate (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone 17e advantage).
Google Pixel Fold delivers better camera performance overall.
Apple iPhone 17e offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Apple iPhone 17e: non-PTA approximately Rs 142,240; PTA not entered. Google Pixel Fold: non-PTA approximately Rs 123,186; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
