Apple iPhone 16e leads
by 16 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
iPhone 16e leads overall versus Galaxy A27. Performance: 84.5 vs 41.1.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 16e
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A27
Best for users who prioritize display.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
34
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 6.1" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Apple iPhone 16e leads | 1170 x 2532Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 60Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Apple iPhone 16e leads | 1200 nitsBetter | 800 nits |
Pixel Density Apple iPhone 16e leads | 457 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Apple iPhone 16e leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | Ceramic Shield glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+Better |
Geekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 8GB | 8GB |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 4.04GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 6 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x4.04GHz + 4x2.20GHz | 4x2.4GHz + 4x1.8GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 1401105 | 885852 |
Geekbench (Single) Apple iPhone 16e leads | 3250Better | 1000 |
Geekbench (Multi) Apple iPhone 16e leads | 8224Better | 2973 |
Storage Apple iPhone 16e leads | 512GBBetter | 256GB |
Storage Type Apple iPhone 16e leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Apple iPhone 16e leads | Apple A18 (3 nm)Better | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
GPU Different | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) | Adreno 710 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Camera
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 48MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 48MP | 50MP + 5MP + 2MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Apple iPhone 16e leads | 1/2.55Better | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Apple iPhone 16e leads | f/1.6Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Close match | None (no telephoto) | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Close match | 10x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, Dolby Vision HDR, OIS, stereo sound rec. | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Close match | 12MP | 12MP |
Front Sensor Different | 12MP TrueDepth camera with autofocus | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Apple iPhone 16e leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Apple iPhone 16e leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, HDRBetter | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama, 3D (spatial) audio | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Generating honest comparison...
iPhone 16e generally outperforms Galaxy A27 across key categories. Chipset: Apple A18 (3 nm) vs Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) This makes iPhone 16e the better choice for most users, though Galaxy A27 may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. iPhone 16e excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who prioritize display. Galaxy A27 offers strong performance in these areas.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 16e | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 107,520 | ≈ Rs 68,600 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 85,999 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 16e and Samsung Galaxy A27 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Apple iPhone 16e scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Apple iPhone 16e is the better choice overall, winning in 5 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A27 advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone 16e advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A27 advantage), Peak Brightness (Apple iPhone 16e advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone 16e advantage).
Apple iPhone 16e has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Apple iPhone 16e offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Apple iPhone 16e: non-PTA approximately Rs 107,520; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy A27: non-PTA approximately Rs 68,600; PTA Rs 85,999. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
