
Chipset: Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
Display: 6.73"
Battery: 5410mAh
Sources: Wikipedia | GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_15_ultra-13657.php | Wikipedia | GSMArena

Chipset: Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
Display: 6.75"
Battery: 5000mAh
Sources: Wikipedia | GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/zte_blade_a35-13468.php
Differences only hides identical specs in the detailed table below. Highlight winners emphasizes the better spec in each row. Changing the score profile recalculates category scores and the overall verdict.
Comparing 15 Ultra and Blade A35. Some specifications are incomplete, so treat this as a directional view.
Scoring profile: balanced
15 Ultra
Best for users who prioritize performance and display.
Blade A35
A solid choice with balanced features.
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Value indices are calculated using score per 1,000 USD to show which phone delivers more for the money.
| Metric | 15 Ultra | Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Budget (price) | $1,026.48 | Not available |
| Price value for budget | 78.91 | Not available |
| Camera for budget | 56.89 | Not available |
| Performance for budget | 85.54 | Not available |
Budget rank unavailable
Generating honest comparison...
Comparing 15 Ultra and Blade A35 based on the available specifications. Some data is incomplete, so treat this as a direction, not a final verdict.
Best for users who prioritize performance and display. 15 Ultra excels in processing power and multitasking.
Based on the available specs, this is a reasonable option—but some key specifications are missing, so we can’t tailor a confident recommendation yet.
| Specification | 15 Ultra | Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size | 6.73" | 6.75"Better |
Resolution | 1440 x 3200Better | 720 x 1600 |
Refresh Rate | 120HzBetter | 90Hz |
Peak Brightness | 3200 nits | Not available |
Pixel Density | 521 ppiBetter | 260 ppi |
Panel Type | OLED | LCD |
Display Protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass 2.0, Mohs level 6 | Not available |
| Specification | 15 Ultra | Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
RAM | 12GBBetter | 2GB |
CPU Clock | 4.32GHzBetter | 1.6GHz |
CPU Cluster Speeds | 2x4.32GHz + 6x3.53GHzBetter | 4x1.6GHz + 4x1.2GHz |
Storage | 512GBBetter | 64GB |
Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | Not available |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) |
GPU | Adreno 830 | IMG8322 |
| Specification | 15 Ultra | Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera | 50MPBetter | 8MP |
Rear Sensor Size | 1/2.51 | Not available |
Rear Aperture | f/1.6 | Not available |
Optical Zoom | 3x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization | YesBetter | No |
Max Video Resolution | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p)Better | 1080p@30fps |
Front Camera | 32MPBetter | 2MP |
Front Aperture | f/2.0 | Not available |
Front Video Resolution | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | Yes |
Camera Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) | LED flash |
Choosing between 15 Ultra and Blade A35 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and pricing in Pakistan so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
We need more verified specifications to make a confident overall call. Compare the detailed specs below.
We don’t have enough complete data to pick a definitive winner yet. Compare the detailed specs below and check back as more verified data is added.
The top differences are: Display Size (Blade A35 advantage), Resolution (15 Ultra advantage), Refresh Rate (15 Ultra advantage), Pixel Density (15 Ultra advantage), RAM (15 Ultra advantage).
Both phones are capable. Compare sensor sizes, OIS, and video features to decide.
15 Ultra offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
15 Ultra typically ranges from $1,026.48 to $1,026.48, while Blade A35 ranges from N/A.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.