
Chipset: Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
Display: 6.9"
Battery: 5000mAh
Sources: Wikipedia | GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s25_ultra-13322.php

Chipset: Unisoc T7200 (12 nm)
Display: 6.75"
Battery: 5000mAh
Sources: GSMArena - https://www.gsmarena.com/zte_blade_a36-13966.php
Differences only hides identical specs in the detailed table below. Highlight winners emphasizes the better spec in each row. Changing the score profile recalculates category scores and the overall verdict.
Comparing Galaxy S25 Ultra and Blade A36. Some specifications are incomplete, so treat this as a directional view.
Scoring profile: balanced
Galaxy S25 Ultra
Best for users who prioritize performance and display.
Blade A36
A solid choice with balanced features.
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Why:
Value indices are calculated using score per 1,000 USD to show which phone delivers more for the money.
| Metric | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Blade A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Budget (price) | $25.00 | $36.00 |
| Price value for budget | 3400.00 | 888.89 |
| Camera for budget | 3064.00 | 436.11 |
| Performance for budget | 3532.00 | 1105.56 |
Galaxy S25 Ultra ranks higher for budget
Generating honest comparison...
Comparing Galaxy S25 Ultra and Blade A36 based on the available specifications. Some data is incomplete, so treat this as a direction, not a final verdict.
Best for users who prioritize performance and display. Galaxy S25 Ultra excels in processing power and multitasking.
A solid choice with balanced features across all categories.
| Specification | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Blade A36 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size | 6.9"Better | 6.75" |
Resolution | 1440 x 3120Better | 720 x 1600 |
Refresh Rate | 120HzBetter | 90Hz |
Peak Brightness | 2600 nits | Not available |
Pixel Density | 498 ppiBetter | 260 ppi |
Panel Type | OLED | LCD |
Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2, Mohs level 6 | DX anti-reflective coating | Mohs level 4 |
| Specification | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Blade A36 |
|---|---|---|
RAM | 12GBBetter | 4GB |
CPU Clock | 4.47GHzBetter | 1.6GHz |
CPU Cluster Speeds | 2x4.47GHz + 6x3.53GHzBetter | 2x1.6GHz + 6x1.6GHz |
Storage | 512GBBetter | 64GB |
Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | Not available |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Unisoc T7200 (12 nm) |
GPU | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Specification | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Blade A36 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera | 200MPBetter | 13MP |
Rear Sensor Size | 1/1.3 | Not available |
Rear Aperture | f/1.7 | Not available |
Optical Zoom | 3x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization | YesBetter | No |
Max Video Resolution | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EISBetter | 1080p@30fps |
Front Camera | 12MPBetter | 5MP |
Front Aperture | f/2.2 | Not available |
Front Video Resolution | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | Yes |
Camera Features | Laser AF, Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash |
Choosing between Galaxy S25 Ultra and Blade A36 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and pricing in Pakistan so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
We need more verified specifications to make a confident overall call. Compare the detailed specs below.
We don’t have enough complete data to pick a definitive winner yet. Compare the detailed specs below and check back as more verified data is added.
The top differences are: Display Size (Galaxy S25 Ultra advantage), Resolution (Galaxy S25 Ultra advantage), Refresh Rate (Galaxy S25 Ultra advantage), Pixel Density (Galaxy S25 Ultra advantage), RAM (Galaxy S25 Ultra advantage).
Both phones are capable. Compare sensor sizes, OIS, and video features to decide.
Galaxy S25 Ultra offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Galaxy S25 Ultra typically ranges from $25.00 to $25.00, while Blade A36 ranges from $36.00 to $36.00.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.