Samsung Galaxy S25 leads
by 13 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy S25 leads overall versus Galaxy A56. Performance: 64.5 vs 92.
Scoring profile: balanced
Samsung Galaxy A56
A solid choice with balanced features.
Samsung Galaxy S25
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
62
Meaningful differences
26
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceResolution
Refresh Rate
Panel Type
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A56 leads | 6.7"Better | 6.2" |
Resolution Close match | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 1900 nits | 2600 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 385 ppi | 416 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Better |
CPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Cores
Geekbench (Single)
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 12GB | 12GB |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 2.9GHz | 4.47GHzBetter |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 1x2.9GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.9GHz | 2x4.47GHz + 6x3.53GHzBetter |
Benchmark Score Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 908689 | 2193701Better |
AnTuTu Score Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 908689 | 2193701Better |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | 1400 | Not available |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 3899 | 10050Better |
Storage Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 256GB | 512GBBetter |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | Exynos 1580 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Better |
GPU Different | Xclipse 540 | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Rear Sensor Size
Rear Aperture
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Camera
Front Aperture
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 50MP + 12MP + 5MP | 50MP + 12MP + 10MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Close match | 1/1.56 | 1/1.56 |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Needs more data | Not available | 3x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 10x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Close match | 12MP | 12MP |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps (regional availability), 10-bit HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Best Face, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
Generating honest comparison...
Galaxy S25 generally outperforms Galaxy A56 across key categories. Chipset: Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) vs Exynos 1580 (4 nm) This makes Galaxy S25 the better choice for most users, though Galaxy A56 may excel in specific areas.
A solid choice with balanced features across all categories.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy S25 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Samsung Galaxy A56 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 97,860 | ≈ Rs 120,380 |
| PTA | Rs 138,999 | Rs 150,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Samsung Galaxy A56 and Samsung Galaxy S25 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy S25 wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy S25 is the better choice overall, winning in 6 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A56 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), Pixel Density (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), CPU Clock (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage).
Samsung Galaxy S25 delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy S25 tends to last longer on a charge.
Samsung Galaxy A56: non-PTA approximately Rs 97,860; PTA Rs 138,999. Samsung Galaxy S25: non-PTA approximately Rs 120,380; PTA Rs 150,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
Optional store listings are separate from the phone prices above. All offer amounts below are PKR; verify the exact device and PTA status before purchase.
Non-PTA, factory-unlocked segment · checked within 30 days
Transparency: We may earn a commission from purchases made through affiliate links. This does not affect the price you pay or our editorial independence. A retailer PTA claim is not an independent DIRBS verification; check the specific device IMEI through PTA before purchase.
