Samsung Galaxy A35 leads
by 5 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy A35 leads overall versus Galaxy A18 4G. Software: 84 vs 25.2.
Scoring profile: balanced
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
Samsung Galaxy A35
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
27
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceResolution
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 6.7"Better | 6.6" |
Resolution Close match | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 90Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 775 nits | 1000 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 385 ppi | 390 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Close match | No | No |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+Better |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 4GB | 12GBBetter |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Close match | 2.4GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Close match | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz | 4x2.4GHz + 4x2.0GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 609489 | 603441 |
Geekbench (Single) Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 980 | 1000Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 2144 | 2931Better |
Storage Close match | 256GB | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | Exynos 1610Better | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G68 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Image Stabilization
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Rear Aperture
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Front Camera
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP | 50MP + 8MP + 5MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 1/2.76 | 1/1.96Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Close match | None (no telephoto) | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Close match | 10x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | No | YesBetter |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Close match | 13MP | 13MP |
Front Sensor Different | 13MP 1/3.1" front camera | 13MP 1/3.06" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | f/2.0Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy A35 leads | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsBetter |
Camera Features Close match | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Galaxy A35 is the better choice overall. Key differences: Galaxy A35 scores higher for camera (66 vs 40.1). Galaxy A18 4G lasts longer on a charge (about 8.6h vs 8.1h of estimated screen-on time). However, Galaxy A18 4G lasts longer on a charge.
Galaxy A35 scores higher overall than Galaxy A18 4G once each category is weighted. Chipset: Exynos 1610 vs Exynos 1380 (5 nm) That makes Galaxy A35 the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A18 4G may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A18 4G provides extended usage with strong software.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy A35 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | -- | ≈ Rs 53,928 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 114,999 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Samsung Galaxy A18 4G and Samsung Galaxy A35 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy A35 scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy A35 is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A35 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A35 advantage), Pixel Density (Samsung Galaxy A35 advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy A35 advantage).
Samsung Galaxy A35 delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G: non-PTA not available; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy A35: non-PTA approximately Rs 53,928; PTA Rs 114,999. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
