Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads
by 4 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy A18 4G leads overall versus Galaxy A16. Software: 58.1 vs 84.2.
Scoring profile: balanced
Samsung Galaxy A16
Best for users who prioritize battery.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G
Best for users who prioritize performance and software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
11
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Peak Brightness
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceDisplay Size
Resolution
Refresh Rate
Pixel Density
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Close match | 6.7" | 6.7" |
Resolution Close match | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 90Hz | 90Hz |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy A16 leads | 808 nitsBetter | 775 nits |
Pixel Density Close match | 385 ppi | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Close match | No | No |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy A16 leads | Glass (unspecified grade)Better | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
RAM Samsung Galaxy A16 leads | 8GBBetter | 4GB |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.2GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x2.2GHz + 6x2.0GHz | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 387422 | 609489 |
Geekbench (Single) Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 720 | 980Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 1920 | 2144Better |
Storage Close match | 256GB | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1610Better |
GPU Different | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
Rear Camera
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Rear Sensor Size
Rear Aperture
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Camera
Front Sensor
Front Aperture
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Close match | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP |
Rear Sensor Size Close match | 1/2.76 | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Close match | None (no telephoto) | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Close match | 10x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | No | No |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Front Camera Close match | 13MP | 13MP |
Front Sensor Different | Samsung S5K3P9 | 13MP 1/3.1" front camera |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Close match | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Galaxy A18 4G is the better choice overall. Key differences: Galaxy A16 lasts longer on a charge (about 9.6h vs 8.6h of estimated screen-on time). Galaxy A16 has more RAM (8GB vs 4GB). However, Galaxy A16 lasts longer on a charge.
Galaxy A18 4G scores higher overall than Galaxy A16 once each category is weighted. Chipset: Exynos 1610 vs Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) That makes Galaxy A18 4G the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A16 may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A16 provides extended usage with efficient power management.
Best for users who prioritize performance and software. Galaxy A18 4G excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | -- | -- |
| PTA | Rs 54,999 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Samsung Galaxy A16 and Samsung Galaxy A18 4G can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G is the better choice overall, winning in 2 key categories.
The top differences are: Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A16 advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy A16 advantage), RAM (Samsung Galaxy A16 advantage), Geekbench (Single) (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage), Geekbench (Multi) (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage).
Both phones are capable. Compare sensor sizes, OIS, and video features to decide.
Samsung Galaxy A16 offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Samsung Galaxy A16: non-PTA not available; PTA Rs 54,999. Samsung Galaxy A18 4G: non-PTA not available; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
