Samsung Galaxy A25 leads
by 8 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy A25 leads overall versus Galaxy A15. Camera: 39.2 vs 63.7.
Scoring profile: balanced
Samsung Galaxy A15
A solid choice with balanced features.
Samsung Galaxy A25
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Data completeness: Samsung Galaxy A15 25%, Samsung Galaxy A25 55%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
59
Meaningful differences
19
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Refresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differenceDisplay Size
Resolution
Pixel Density
Panel Type
Display Protection
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Close match | 6.5" | 6.5" |
Resolution Close match | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 90Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 800 nits | 1000 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Close match | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
Display Protection Needs more data | Not available | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
CPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Cores
Storage
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 8GB | 8GB |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 2.2GHz | 2.4GHzBetter |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 2x2.2GHz + 6x2.0GHz | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHzBetter |
Benchmark Score Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 375314 | 480771Better |
AnTuTu Score Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 375314 | 480771Better |
Geekbench (Single) Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 1928 | 2023Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 1936 | 2098Better |
Storage Close match | 256GB | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm)Better |
GPU Different | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Image Stabilization
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceRear Camera
Rear Aperture
Digital Zoom
Front Camera
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP | 50MP + 8MP + 2MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Digital Zoom Close match | 10x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | No | YesBetter |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Close match | 13MP | 13MP |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy A15 leads | f/2.0Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Close match | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Generating honest comparison...
Galaxy A25 vs Galaxy A15: A25 offers Exynos 1280 with 120Hz AMOLED and OIS camera for better gaming and video stability. A15 gives Helio G99 with 90Hz display and bigger 5000mAh battery for budget users. Choose A25 for performance, A15 for battery and price.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Galaxy A25 generally outperforms Galaxy A15 across key categories. Chipset: Exynos 1280 (5 nm) vs Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) This makes Galaxy A25 the better choice for most users, though Galaxy A15 may excel in specific areas.
A solid choice with balanced features across all categories.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy A25 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 26,880 | ≈ Rs 36,120 |
| PTA | Rs 44,999 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Samsung Galaxy A15 and Samsung Galaxy A25 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy A25 wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy A25 is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), CPU Clock (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), CPU Cluster Speeds (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Benchmark Score (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage).
Samsung Galaxy A25 delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy A25 tends to last longer on a charge.
Samsung Galaxy A15: non-PTA approximately Rs 26,880; PTA Rs 44,999. Samsung Galaxy A25: non-PTA approximately Rs 36,120; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
