Samsung Galaxy S25 leads
by 34 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy S25 leads overall versus Galaxy A08 4G. Performance: 24.9 vs 87.8.
Scoring profile: balanced
Samsung Galaxy A08 4G
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
Samsung Galaxy S25
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
41
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | 6.7"Better | 6.2" |
Resolution Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 720 x 1600 | 1080 x 2340Better |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 90Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 480 nits | 2600 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 262 ppi | 416 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Different | LCD | OLED |
HDR Support Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | No | YesBetter |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | Glass (unspecified grade) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Better |
RAM
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
GPU
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 4GB | 12GBBetter |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.2GHz | 4.47GHz |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x2.2GHz + 6x2.0GHz | 2x4.47GHz + 6x3.53GHz |
AnTuTu Score Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 400000 | 2193701Better |
Geekbench (Single) Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 720 | 3100Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 1950 | 10050Better |
Storage Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 256GB | 512GBBetter |
Storage Type Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1Better |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Better |
GPU Different | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 830 (1200 MHz) |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceOptical Image Stabilization
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceRear Camera
Rear Aperture
Digital Zoom
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 50MP | 50MP + 12MP + 10MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 1/2.76 | 1/1.56Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | None (no telephoto) | 3xBetter |
Digital Zoom Different | 10x | 30x |
Optical Image Stabilization Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | No | YesBetter |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Samsung Galaxy S25 leads | 8MP | 12MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | 8MP 1/4.0" front camera | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | f/2.0Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Different | Supported (resolution not published) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | LED flash | Best Face, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
Galaxy S25 is the better choice overall. Key differences: Galaxy S25 scores higher for camera (74.2 vs 40). Galaxy A08 4G lasts longer on a charge (about 9.5h vs 8.5h of estimated screen-on time). However, Galaxy A08 4G lasts longer on a charge.
Galaxy S25 scores higher overall than Galaxy A08 4G once each category is weighted. Chipset: Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) vs Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) That makes Galaxy S25 the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A08 4G may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A08 4G provides extended usage with strong software.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy S25 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | -- | ≈ Rs 120,380 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 150,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Samsung Galaxy A08 4G and Samsung Galaxy S25 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy S25 scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy S25 is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A08 4G advantage), Resolution (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage), Pixel Density (Samsung Galaxy S25 advantage).
Samsung Galaxy S25 delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy A08 4G offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Samsung Galaxy A08 4G: non-PTA not available; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy S25: non-PTA approximately Rs 120,380; PTA Rs 150,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
