Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads
by 8 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy S26 Ultra leads overall versus Find X9. Software: 71.4 vs 100.
Scoring profile: balanced
Oppo Find X9
A solid choice with balanced features.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Data completeness: Oppo Find X9 45%, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 100%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
23
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 6.59" | 6.9"Better |
Resolution Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 1256 x 2760 | 1440 x 3120Better |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Oppo Find X9 leads | 3600 nitsBetter | 2600 nits |
Pixel Density Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 460 ppi | 498 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Not available | Yes |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Ultra HDR image support | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | DX anti-reflective coating Privacy DisplayBetter |
Geekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
Storage Type
Chipset
GPU
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 16GB | 16GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | Not available | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Different | 4.21GHz | 4.74GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | Not available | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 1x4.21GHz + 3x3.5GHz + 4x2.7GHz | 2x4.74GHz + 6x3.62GHz |
AnTuTu Score Needs more data | Not available | 3892165 |
Geekbench (Single) Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 3264 | 3800Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 9551 | 11566Better |
Storage Close match | 1024GB | 1024GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Chipset Close match | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) |
GPU Different | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 840 (1.3GHz) |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceDigital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 50MP | 200MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 50MP + 50MP + 50MP | 200MP + 50MP + 50MP + 10MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 1/1.4 | 1/1.3Better |
Rear Aperture Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | f/1.6 | f/1.4Better |
Optical Zoom Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 3x | 5xBetter |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | Not available | 100x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EISBetter |
Front Camera Oppo Find X9 leads | 32MPBetter | 12MP |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Not available | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads | f/2.4 | f/2.2Better |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
Generating honest comparison...
Galaxy S26 Ultra generally outperforms Find X9 across key categories. Battery Capacity: 7025mAh vs 5000mAh This makes Galaxy S26 Ultra the better choice for most users, though Find X9 may excel in specific areas.
A solid choice with balanced features across all categories.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy S26 Ultra excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 365,960 | ≈ Rs 299,317 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 365,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Oppo Find X9 and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better choice overall, winning in 5 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Resolution (Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Peak Brightness (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Pixel Density (Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra advantage).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers better camera performance overall.
Battery life depends on usage. Check capacity, charging speed, and efficiency.
Oppo Find X9: non-PTA approximately Rs 365,960; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: non-PTA approximately Rs 299,317; PTA Rs 365,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
