Oppo Find X9 leads
by 4 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Find X9 leads overall versus Galaxy S26 FE. Software: 71.4 vs 100.
Scoring profile: balanced
Oppo Find X9
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Best for users who prioritize build and software.
Data completeness: Oppo Find X9 45%, Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 100%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
26
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 FE |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy S26 FE leads | 6.59" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Oppo Find X9 leads | 1256 x 2760Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Oppo Find X9 leads | 3600 nitsBetter | 1900 nits |
Pixel Density Oppo Find X9 leads | 460 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Not available | Yes |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy S26 FE leads | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Ultra HDR image support | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+Better |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 FE |
|---|---|---|
RAM Oppo Find X9 leads | 16GBBetter | 8GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | Not available | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Different | 4.21GHz | 3.3GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | Not available | 10 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 1x4.21GHz + 3x3.5GHz + 4x2.7GHz | 1x3.3GHz + 2x2.74GHz + 5x2.36GHz + 2x1.8GHz |
AnTuTu Score Needs more data | Not available | 2535201 |
Geekbench (Single) Oppo Find X9 leads | 3264Better | 2300 |
Geekbench (Multi) Oppo Find X9 leads | 9551Better | 8035 |
Storage Oppo Find X9 leads | 1024GBBetter | 512GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Chipset Oppo Find X9 leads | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm)Better | Exynos 2500 (3 nm) |
GPU Different | Arm G1-Ultra | Xclipse 950 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceRear Camera
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 FE |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Oppo Find X9 leads | 50MP + 50MP + 50MPBetter | 50MP + 12MP + 8MP |
Rear Sensor Size Oppo Find X9 leads | 1/1.4Better | 1/1.56 |
Rear Aperture Oppo Find X9 leads | f/1.6Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Close match | 3x | 3x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | Not available | 30x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S26 FE leads | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+Better |
Front Camera Oppo Find X9 leads | 32MPBetter | 12MP |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Not available | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy S26 FE leads | f/2.4 | f/2.2Better |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
Camera Features Different | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face |
Generating honest comparison...
Find X9 generally outperforms Galaxy S26 FE across key categories. Chipset: Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) vs Exynos 2500 (3 nm) This makes Find X9 the better choice for most users, though Galaxy S26 FE may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Find X9 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who prioritize build and software. Galaxy S26 FE offers strong performance in these areas.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S26 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 365,960 | ≈ Rs 195,997 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 250,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Oppo Find X9 and Samsung Galaxy S26 FE can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Oppo Find X9 scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Oppo Find X9 is the better choice overall, winning in 3 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy S26 FE advantage), Resolution (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Peak Brightness (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Pixel Density (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy S26 FE advantage).
Oppo Find X9 has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Battery life depends on usage. Check capacity, charging speed, and efficiency.
Oppo Find X9: non-PTA approximately Rs 365,960; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy S26 FE: non-PTA approximately Rs 195,997; PTA Rs 250,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
