Google Pixel Fold leads
by 5 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel Fold leads overall versus Galaxy A27. Software: 54.3 vs 80.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel Fold
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A27
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
35
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Google Pixel Fold leads | 7.6"Better | 6.7" |
Resolution Google Pixel Fold leads | 1840 x 2208Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Google Pixel Fold leads | 1450 nitsBetter | 800 nits |
Pixel Density Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 378 ppi | 385 ppiBetter |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Google Pixel Fold leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+Better |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Google Pixel Fold leads | 12GBBetter | 8GB |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.85GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x2.85GHz + 2x2.35GHz + 4x1.80GHz | 4x2.4GHz + 4x1.8GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 800000 | 885852 |
Geekbench (Single) Google Pixel Fold leads | 1450Better | 1000 |
Geekbench (Multi) Google Pixel Fold leads | 3600Better | 2973 |
Storage Google Pixel Fold leads | 512GBBetter | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Google Pixel Fold leads | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)Better | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G710 MP7 | Adreno 710 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceDigital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Sensor
Front Aperture
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 48MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Google Pixel Fold leads | 48MP + 10.8MP + 10.8MPBetter | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel Fold leads | 1/2Better | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Google Pixel Fold leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Google Pixel Fold leads | 5xBetter | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Different | 20x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 9.5MP | 12MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | 9.5MP cover camera + 8MP inner camera | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Google Pixel Fold leads | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fpsBetter | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Generating honest comparison...
Pixel Fold generally outperforms Galaxy A27 across key categories. Chipset: Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) vs Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) This makes Pixel Fold the better choice for most users, though Galaxy A27 may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Pixel Fold excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A27 provides extended usage with strong software.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel Fold | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 123,186 | ≈ Rs 68,600 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 85,999 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel Fold and Samsung Galaxy A27 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel Fold scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel Fold is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel Fold advantage), Pixel Density (Samsung Galaxy A27 advantage), HDR Support (Google Pixel Fold advantage).
Google Pixel Fold has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A27 tends to last longer on a charge.
Google Pixel Fold: non-PTA approximately Rs 123,186; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy A27: non-PTA approximately Rs 68,600; PTA Rs 85,999. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
