Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads
by 4 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy S25 FE leads overall versus Pixel 9a. Build: 73.5 vs 88.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 9a
Best for users who prioritize display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
62
Meaningful differences
29
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 6.3" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Google Pixel 9a leads | 1080 x 2424Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Google Pixel 9a leads | 2700 nitsBetter | 1900 nits |
Pixel Density Google Pixel 9a leads | 421 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Close match | Yes | Yes |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+Better |
CPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cores
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
Geekbench (Single)
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 8GB | 8GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | Not available | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 3.1GHz | 3.2GHzBetter |
CPU Cores Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 8 | 10Better |
CPU Cluster Speeds Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1x3.1GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.9GHz | 1x3.2GHz + 2x2.9GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.95GHzBetter |
Benchmark Score Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1254417 | 1521140Better |
AnTuTu Score Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1254417 | 1521140Better |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | Not available | 2011 |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 4527 | 6948Better |
Storage Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 256GB | 512GBBetter |
Storage Type Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0Better |
Chipset Google Pixel 9a leads | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Better | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G715 MP7 | Xclipse 940 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Aperture
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 48MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 48MP + 13MP | 50MP + 12MP + 8MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1/2 | 1/1.57Better |
Rear Aperture Google Pixel 9a leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Needs more data | Not available | 3x |
Digital Zoom Different | 8x | 30x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+Better |
Front Camera Google Pixel 9a leads | 13MPBetter | 12MP |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+Better |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face |
Generating honest comparison...
Galaxy S25 FE generally outperforms Pixel 9a across key categories. Chipset: Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) vs Exynos 2400 (4 nm) This makes Galaxy S25 FE the better choice for most users, though Pixel 9a may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize display. Pixel 9a offers strong performance in these areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy S25 FE excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 93,083 | ≈ Rs 103,586 |
| PTA | -- | Rs 150,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 9a and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy S25 FE advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel 9a advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel 9a advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 9a advantage), Display Protection (Samsung Galaxy S25 FE advantage).
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE tends to last longer on a charge.
Google Pixel 9a: non-PTA approximately Rs 93,083; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: non-PTA approximately Rs 103,586; PTA Rs 150,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
