Google Pixel 9 Pro leads
by 5 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel 9 Pro leads overall versus Galaxy S25 FE. Display: 90.9 vs 68.5.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Best for users who prioritize camera and display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
62
Meaningful differences
27
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 6.3" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 1280 x 2856Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 3000 nitsBetter | 1900 nits |
Pixel Density Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 497 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Not available | Yes |
Display Protection Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Better | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
RAM
Key differenceCPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Cores
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
RAM Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 16GBBetter | 8GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | Not available | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 3.1GHz | 3.2GHzBetter |
CPU Cores Needs more data | Not available | 10 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1x3.1GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.92GHz | 1x3.2GHz + 2x2.9GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.95GHzBetter |
Benchmark Score Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1088917 | 1521140Better |
AnTuTu Score Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 1088917 | 1521140Better |
Geekbench (Single) Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 3850Better | 2011 |
Geekbench (Multi) Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | 4728 | 6948Better |
Storage Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 1024GBBetter | 512GB |
Storage Type Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0Better |
Chipset Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Better | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G715 MC7 | Xclipse 940 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceRear Camera
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Aperture
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 50MP + 48MPBetter | 50MP + 12MP + 8MP |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 1/1.31Better | 1/1.57 |
Rear Aperture Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 5xBetter | 3x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | Not available | 30x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 8K@30fps (via cloud-based upscaling), 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
Front Camera Google Pixel 9 Pro leads | 42MPBetter | 12MP |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
Camera Features Different | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face |
Generating honest comparison...
Pixel 9 Pro generally outperforms Galaxy S25 FE across key categories. Chipset: Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) vs Exynos 2400 (4 nm) This makes Pixel 9 Pro the better choice for most users, though Galaxy S25 FE may excel in specific areas.
Best for photographers and content creators. Pixel 9 Pro offers superior camera capabilities with strong display.
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery. Galaxy S25 FE excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 111,997 | ≈ Rs 103,586 |
| PTA | Rs 150,000 | Rs 150,000 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel 9 Pro wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel 9 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 3 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy S25 FE advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel 9 Pro advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel 9 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 9 Pro advantage), Display Protection (Google Pixel 9 Pro advantage).
Google Pixel 9 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE tends to last longer on a charge.
Google Pixel 9 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 111,997; PTA Rs 150,000. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: non-PTA approximately Rs 103,586; PTA Rs 150,000. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
