Google Pixel 8 Pro leads
by 6 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel 8 Pro leads overall versus Galaxy A37. Software: 100 vs 80.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A37
Best for users who prioritize battery.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
61
Meaningful differences
26
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Resolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Size
Refresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
Display Protection
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A37 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Close match | 6.7" | 6.7" |
Resolution Phone A leads | 1344 x 2992Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Phone A leads | 2400 nitsBetter | 1900 nits |
Pixel Density Phone A leads | 490 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Yes | Not available |
Display Protection Needs more data | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
CPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Cores
Geekbench (Single)
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A37 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 12GB | 12GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | LPDDR5X | Not available |
CPU Clock Phone A leads | 2.91GHzBetter | 2.75GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | 9 | Not available |
CPU Cluster Speeds Phone A leads | 1x2.91GHz + 4x2.37GHz + 4x1.70GHzBetter | 4x2.75GHz + 4x2.0GHz |
Benchmark Score Phone A leads | 1151243Better | 912055 |
AnTuTu Score Phone A leads | 1151243Better | 912055 |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | 3613 | Not available |
Geekbench (Multi) Phone A leads | 4462Better | 3345 |
Storage Phone A leads | 1024GBBetter | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Phone A leads | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)Better | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
GPU Needs more data | Mali-G715 MP7 | Xclipse 530 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Aperture
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A37 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Phone A leads | 50MP + 48MPBetter | 50MP + 8MP + 5MP |
Rear Sensor Size Phone A leads | 1/1.31Better | 1/1.56 |
Rear Aperture Phone A leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Needs more data | 5x | Not available |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 30x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDRBetter | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Phone B leads | 10.5MP | 12MPBetter |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 | Not available |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fpsBetter | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 10-bit HDR |
Camera Features Needs more data | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Generating honest comparison...
Pixel 8 Pro generally outperforms Galaxy A37 across key categories. Resolution: 1344 x 2992 vs 1080 x 2340 This makes Pixel 8 Pro the better choice for most users, though Galaxy A37 may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Pixel 8 Pro excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A37 provides extended usage with efficient power management.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A37 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 75,040 – Rs 139,720 | ≈ Rs 78,120 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A37 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel 8 Pro wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel 8 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 5 key categories.
The top differences are: Resolution (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), CPU Clock (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), CPU Cluster Speeds (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage).
Google Pixel 8 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A37 tends to last longer on a charge.
Google Pixel 8 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 75,040 – Rs 139,720; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy A37: non-PTA approximately Rs 78,120; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
