Google Pixel 8 Pro leads
by 15 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel 8 Pro leads overall versus Galaxy A27. Build: 89.5 vs 59.3.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A27
Best for users who prioritize software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
34
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Resolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceDisplay Size
Refresh Rate
Panel Type
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Close match | 6.7" | 6.7" |
Resolution Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 1344 x 2992Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 2400 nitsBetter | 800 nits |
Pixel Density Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 490 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Better | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 12GBBetter | 8GB |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.91GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 9 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 1x2.91GHz + 4x2.37GHz + 4x1.70GHz | 4x2.4GHz + 4x1.8GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 1151243 | 885852 |
Geekbench (Single) Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 1750Better | 1000 |
Geekbench (Multi) Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 4400Better | 2973 |
Storage Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 1024GBBetter | 256GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)Better | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G715 MP7 | Adreno 710 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Sensor
Front Aperture
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 50MP + 48MP + 48MPBetter | 50MP + 5MP + 2MP |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 1/1.31Better | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 5xBetter | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Different | 30x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Samsung Galaxy A27 leads | 10.5MP | 12MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 | 12MP 1/3.2" front camera |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Google Pixel 8 Pro leads | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fpsBetter | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Pixel 8 Pro is the better choice overall. Key differences: Pixel 8 Pro scores higher for camera (82.6 vs 61.6). Pixel 8 Pro scores higher for battery (68.2 vs 66.2). However, Galaxy A27 may still suit your needs better depending on your priorities.
Pixel 8 Pro scores higher overall than Galaxy A27 once each category is weighted. Chipset: Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) vs Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) That makes Pixel 8 Pro the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A27 may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Pixel 8 Pro excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who prioritize software. Galaxy A27 offers strong performance in these areas.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 75,040 – Rs 139,720 | ≈ Rs 68,600 |
| PTA | Rs 90,000 | Rs 85,999 |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A27 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel 8 Pro scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel 8 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 5 key categories.
The top differences are: Resolution (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), HDR Support (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage), Display Protection (Google Pixel 8 Pro advantage).
Google Pixel 8 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Google Pixel 8 Pro offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Google Pixel 8 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 75,040 – Rs 139,720; PTA Rs 90,000. Samsung Galaxy A27: non-PTA approximately Rs 68,600; PTA Rs 85,999. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
