Google Pixel 6a leads
by 4 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel 6a leads overall versus Galaxy A25. Build: 66.8 vs 27.7.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 6a
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery.
Samsung Galaxy A25
Best for users who prioritize camera and display.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
35
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
| Specification | Google Pixel 6a | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 6.1" | 6.5"Better |
Resolution Google Pixel 6a leads | 1080 x 2400Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 60Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 876 nits | 1000 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Google Pixel 6a leads | 431 ppiBetter | 396 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Google Pixel 6a leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5Better |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 6a | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 6GB | 8GBBetter |
RAM Type Different | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.8GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Close match | 8 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x2.80GHz + 2x2.25GHz + 4x1.80GHz | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 680000 | 480771 |
Geekbench (Single) Google Pixel 6a leads | 1350Better | 920 |
Geekbench (Multi) Google Pixel 6a leads | 3300Better | 2098 |
Storage Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 128GB | 256GBBetter |
Storage Type Google Pixel 6a leads | UFS 3.1Better | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Google Pixel 6a leads | Google Tensor (5 nm)Better | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
GPU Different | Mali-G78 MP20 | Mali-G68 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 6a | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 12.2MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 12.2MP + 12MP | 50MP + 8MP + 2MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel 6a leads | 1/2.55Better | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Google Pixel 6a leads | f/1.7Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Close match | None (no telephoto) | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Different | 7x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Google Pixel 6a leads | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OISBetter | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Samsung Galaxy A25 leads | 8MP | 13MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | 8MP (Sony IMX355) | 13MP front camera |
Front Aperture Google Pixel 6a leads | f/2.0Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Pixel 6a is the better choice overall. Key differences: Galaxy A25 scores higher for camera (61.7 vs 50.7). Pixel 6a lasts longer on a charge (about 8.3h vs 6.7h of estimated screen-on time). However, Galaxy A25 scores higher for camera.
Pixel 6a scores higher overall than Galaxy A25 once each category is weighted. Chipset: Google Tensor (5 nm) vs Exynos 1280 (5 nm) That makes Pixel 6a the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A25 may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and battery. Pixel 6a excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for photographers and content creators. Galaxy A25 offers superior camera capabilities with strong display.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 6a | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 41,440 | ≈ Rs 36,120 |
| PTA | Rs 51,500 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 6a and Samsung Galaxy A25 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel 6a scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel 6a is the better choice overall, winning in 3 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel 6a advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 6a advantage).
Samsung Galaxy A25 delivers better camera performance overall.
Google Pixel 6a offers better battery endurance for heavy use.
Google Pixel 6a: non-PTA approximately Rs 41,440; PTA Rs 51,500. Samsung Galaxy A25: non-PTA approximately Rs 36,120; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
