Google Pixel 11 Pro leads
by 3 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Pixel 11 Pro leads overall versus Find X9. Software: 100 vs 71.4.
Scoring profile: balanced
Google Pixel 11 Pro
Best for users who prioritize camera and display.
Oppo Find X9
Best for users who prioritize performance.
Data completeness: Google Pixel 11 Pro 100%, Oppo Find X9 45%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
22
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Peak Brightness
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Oppo Find X9 leads | 6.3" | 6.59"Better |
Resolution Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 1280 x 2856Better | 1256 x 2760 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Close match | 3600 nits | 3600 nits |
Pixel Density Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 497 ppiBetter | 460 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Yes | Not available |
Display Protection Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Better | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Ultra HDR image support |
Geekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
Storage Type
GPU
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 16GB | 16GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | LPDDR5X | Not available |
CPU Clock Different | 4.1GHz | 4.21GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | 7 | Not available |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 1x4.1GHz + 4x3.4GHz + 2x2.65GHz | 1x4.21GHz + 3x3.5GHz + 4x2.7GHz |
AnTuTu Score Needs more data | 1952524 | Not available |
Geekbench (Single) Oppo Find X9 leads | 2690 | 3264Better |
Geekbench (Multi) Oppo Find X9 leads | 7450 | 9551Better |
Storage Close match | 1024GB | 1024GB |
Storage Type Close match | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Chipset Oppo Find X9 leads | Google Tensor G6 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm)Better |
GPU Different | IMG CXTP-48-1536 | Arm G1-Ultra |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceRear Camera
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 50MP | 50MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Oppo Find X9 leads | 50MP + 48MP | 50MP + 50MP + 50MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 1/1.3Better | 1/1.4 |
Rear Aperture Oppo Find X9 leads | f/1.7 | f/1.6Better |
Optical Zoom Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 5xBetter | 3x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 100x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDRBetter | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG |
Front Camera Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | 42MPBetter | 32MP |
Front Sensor Needs more data | 42MP ultrawide | Not available |
Front Aperture Google Pixel 11 Pro leads | f/2.2Better | f/2.4 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Camera Features Different | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
Generating honest comparison...
Pixel 11 Pro generally outperforms Find X9 across key categories. Chipset: Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) vs Google Tensor G6 (3 nm) This makes Pixel 11 Pro the better choice for most users, though Find X9 may excel in specific areas.
Best for photographers and content creators. Pixel 11 Pro offers superior camera capabilities with strong display.
Best for users who prioritize performance and gaming. Find X9 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Google Pixel 11 Pro | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 299,320 | ≈ Rs 365,960 |
| PTA | Rs 345,000 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Google Pixel 11 Pro and Oppo Find X9 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Google Pixel 11 Pro scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Google Pixel 11 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel 11 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Google Pixel 11 Pro advantage), Display Protection (Google Pixel 11 Pro advantage), Geekbench (Single) (Oppo Find X9 advantage).
Google Pixel 11 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Battery life depends on usage. Check capacity, charging speed, and efficiency.
Google Pixel 11 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 299,320; PTA Rs 345,000. Oppo Find X9: non-PTA approximately Rs 365,960; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
