Samsung Galaxy A25 leads
by 6 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy A25 leads overall versus iPhone X. Software: 91.4 vs 62.9.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone X
Best for users who prioritize software.
Samsung Galaxy A25
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Data completeness: Apple iPhone X 100%, Samsung Galaxy A25 40%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
61
Meaningful differences
25
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differencePanel Type
HDR Support
Display Protection
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Phone B leads | 5.8" | 6.5"Better |
Resolution Phone A leads | 1125 x 2436Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Phone B leads | 60Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Phone B leads | 625 nits | 1000 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Phone A leads | 463 ppiBetter | 396 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Yes | Not available |
Display Protection Needs more data | Scratch-resistant glass | 3D Touch | Not available |
RAM
Key differenceCPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Cores
Geekbench (Single)
Storage
Storage Type
Chipset
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Phone B leads | 3GB | 8GBBetter |
RAM Type Needs more data | LPDDR4X | Not available |
CPU Clock Phone B leads | 2.39GHz | 2.4GHzBetter |
CPU Cores Needs more data | 6 | Not available |
CPU Cluster Speeds Phone B leads | 2.39GHz | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHzBetter |
Benchmark Score Phone B leads | 233100 | 480771Better |
AnTuTu Score Phone B leads | 233100 | 480771Better |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | Not available | 2023 |
Geekbench (Multi) Phone A leads | 10215Better | 2098 |
Storage Close match | 256GB | 256GB |
Storage Type Needs more data | NVMe | Not available |
Chipset Close match | Apple A11 Bionic (10 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
GPU Needs more data | Apple GPU (three-core graphics) | Mali-G68 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceRear Aperture
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Sensor
Front Aperture
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Phone B leads | 12MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Phone B leads | 12MP | 50MP + 8MP + 2MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Phone B leads | 1/3 | 1/2.76Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Needs more data | 2x | Not available |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 10x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fpsBetter | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Front Camera Phone B leads | 7MP | 13MPBetter |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Sony IMX319 | Not available |
Front Aperture Close match | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Needs more data | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama), panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Generating honest comparison...
Galaxy A25 generally outperforms iPhone X across key categories. Display Size: 6.5" vs 5.8" This makes Galaxy A25 the better choice for most users, though iPhone X may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize software. iPhone X offers strong performance in these areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Galaxy A25 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 23,800 – Rs 42,000 | ≈ Rs 36,120 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone X and Samsung Galaxy A25 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy A25 wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy A25 is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone X advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A25 advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone X advantage).
Samsung Galaxy A25 delivers better camera performance overall.
Samsung Galaxy A25 tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone X: non-PTA approximately Rs 23,800 – Rs 42,000; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy A25: non-PTA approximately Rs 36,120; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
