Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads
by 5 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Galaxy A18 4G leads overall versus iPhone X. Software: 0 vs 84.2.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone X
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
31
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 5.8" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Apple iPhone X leads | 1125 x 2436Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 60Hz | 90HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 625 nits | 775 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Apple iPhone X leads | 463 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Apple iPhone X leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Apple iPhone X leads | Scratch-resistant glass | 3D TouchBetter | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
Storage
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
RAM Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 3GB | 4GBBetter |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 2.39GHz | 2.4GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 6 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2.39GHz | 2x2.4GHz + 6x2.0GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 233100 | 609489 |
Geekbench (Single) Apple iPhone X leads | 1150Better | 980 |
Geekbench (Multi) Apple iPhone X leads | 2600Better | 2144 |
Storage Close match | 256GB | 256GB |
Storage Type Apple iPhone X leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | Apple A11 Bionic (10 nm) | Exynos 1610Better |
GPU Different | Apple GPU (three-core graphics) | Mali-G68 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceOptical Image Stabilization
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceRear Aperture
Digital Zoom
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 12MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 12MP + 12MP | 50MP + 5MP + 2MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 1/3 | 1/2.76Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Apple iPhone X leads | 2xBetter | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Close match | 10x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Apple iPhone X leads | YesBetter | No |
Max Video Resolution Apple iPhone X leads | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fpsBetter | 1080p@30fps |
Front Camera Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | 7MP | 13MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | Sony IMX319 | 13MP 1/3.1" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy A18 4G leads | f/2.2 | f/2.0Better |
Front Video Resolution Close match | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Camera Features Different | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama), panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
Galaxy A18 4G is the better choice overall. Key differences: iPhone X scores higher for camera (54.5 vs 40.1). Galaxy A18 4G lasts longer on a charge (about 8.6h vs 6.5h of estimated screen-on time). However, iPhone X scores higher for camera.
Galaxy A18 4G scores higher overall than iPhone X once each category is weighted. Chipset: Exynos 1610 vs Apple A11 Bionic (10 nm) That makes Galaxy A18 4G the safer all-round pick, though iPhone X may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. iPhone X excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A18 4G provides extended usage with strong software.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone X | Samsung Galaxy A18 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 23,800 – Rs 42,000 | -- |
| PTA | Rs 37,000 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone X and Samsung Galaxy A18 4G can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G is the better choice overall, winning in 2 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone X advantage), Refresh Rate (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage), Peak Brightness (Samsung Galaxy A18 4G advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone X advantage).
Apple iPhone X has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A18 4G tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone X: non-PTA approximately Rs 23,800 – Rs 42,000; PTA Rs 37,000. Samsung Galaxy A18 4G: non-PTA not available; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
