Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads
by 3 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
iPhone 16 Pro leads overall versus Galaxy S25 FE. Battery: 63.1 vs 89.2.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
61
Meaningful differences
26
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
Display Protection
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Phone B leads | 6.3" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Phone A leads | 1206 x 2622Better | 1080 x 2340 |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Phone A leads | 2000 nitsBetter | 1900 nits |
Pixel Density Phone A leads | 458 ppiBetter | 385 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Yes | Not available |
Display Protection Needs more data | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen), Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
CPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM
RAM Type
CPU Cores
Geekbench (Single)
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
RAM Close match | 8GB | 8GB |
RAM Type Needs more data | LPDDR5X | Not available |
CPU Clock Phone A leads | 4.05GHzBetter | 3.2GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | 6 | Not available |
CPU Cluster Speeds Phone A leads | 2x4.05GHz + 4x2.42GHzBetter | 1x3.2GHz + 2x2.9GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.95GHz |
Benchmark Score Phone A leads | 1871052Better | 1521140 |
AnTuTu Score Phone A leads | 1871052Better | 1521140 |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | 3500 | Not available |
Geekbench (Multi) Phone A leads | 8283Better | 6948 |
Storage Phone A leads | 1024GBBetter | 512GB |
Storage Type Phone A leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 4.0 |
Chipset Phone A leads | Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)Better | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
GPU Needs more data | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) | Xclipse 940 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Aperture
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Front Camera
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Phone B leads | 48MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Phone B leads | 48MP + 12MP | 50MP + 12MP + 8MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Phone A leads | 1/1.28Better | 1/1.57 |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Phone A leads | 5xBetter | 3x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 25x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Phone B leads | 4K@24/25/30/60/100/120fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video/audio, stereo sound rec. | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+Better |
Front Camera Close match | 12MP | 12MP |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Sony IMX714 | Not available |
Front Aperture Phone A leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EISBetter | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
Camera Features Needs more data | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face |
Generating honest comparison...
iPhone 16 Pro generally outperforms Galaxy S25 FE across key categories. Display Size: 6.7" vs 6.3" This makes iPhone 16 Pro the better choice for most users, though Galaxy S25 FE may excel in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. iPhone 16 Pro excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy S25 FE provides extended usage with strong software.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 148,960 – Rs 301,000 | ≈ Rs 103,586 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro wins more categories overall, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy S25 FE advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone 16 Pro advantage), Peak Brightness (Apple iPhone 16 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone 16 Pro advantage), CPU Clock (Apple iPhone 16 Pro advantage).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 148,960 – Rs 301,000; PTA not entered. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: non-PTA approximately Rs 103,586; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
