Too close to call
Both score within 2 points on overall. Your priorities decide this one.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are closely matched overall. Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads in performance and camera. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads in battery and software.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
Data completeness: Apple iPhone 16 Pro 100%, Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 40%. Blue shows the higher available score, not a final winner.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
61
Meaningful differences
25
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Panel Type
HDR Support
Display Protection
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Phone B leads | 6.3" | 8"Better |
Resolution Phone B leads | 1206 x 2622 | 2076 x 2152Better |
Refresh Rate Close match | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness Phone B leads | 2000 nits | 2700 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Phone A leads | 458 ppiBetter | 374 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Needs more data | Yes | Not available |
Display Protection Needs more data | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen), Mohs level 4 | Not available |
RAM
Key differenceCPU Clock
Key differenceCPU Cluster Speeds
Key differenceBenchmark Score
Key differenceAnTuTu Score
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Cores
Geekbench (Single)
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
RAM Phone B leads | 8GB | 16GBBetter |
RAM Type Needs more data | LPDDR5X | Not available |
CPU Clock Phone A leads | 4.05GHzBetter | 3.1GHz |
CPU Cores Needs more data | 6 | Not available |
CPU Cluster Speeds Phone A leads | 2x4.05GHz + 4x2.42GHzBetter | 1x3.1GHz + 3x2.6GHz + 4x1.92GHz |
Benchmark Score Phone A leads | 1871052Better | 1222228 |
AnTuTu Score Phone A leads | 1871052Better | 1222228 |
Geekbench (Single) Needs more data | 3500 | Not available |
Geekbench (Multi) Phone A leads | 8283Better | 4783 |
Storage Phone A leads | 1024GBBetter | 512GB |
Storage Type Phone A leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 3.1 |
Chipset Phone A leads | Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)Better | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) |
GPU Needs more data | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) | Mali-G715 MC7 |
Rear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Camera
Optical Zoom
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Close match | 48MP | 48MP |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Phone B leads | 48MP + 12MP | 48MP + 10.8MP + 10.5MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Phone A leads | 1/1.28Better | 1/2 |
Rear Aperture Phone B leads | f/1.8 | f/1.7Better |
Optical Zoom Close match | 5x | 5x |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 25x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@24/25/30/60/100/120fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video/audio, stereo sound rec. | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS |
Front Camera Phone A leads | 12MPBetter | 10MP |
Front Sensor Needs more data | Sony IMX714 | Not available |
Front Aperture Phone A leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.2 |
Front Video Resolution Phone A leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EISBetter | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Camera Features Needs more data | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
Generating honest comparison...
iPhone 16 Pro and Pixel 9 Pro Fold are closely matched. Display Size: 8" vs 6.3" Resolution: 2076 x 2152 vs 1206 x 2622 The choice depends on your priorities.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. iPhone 16 Pro excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Pixel 9 Pro Fold provides extended usage with strong software.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 148,960 – Rs 301,000 | ≈ Rs 237,440 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Both phones excel in different areas. Choose based on your priority.
Both phones have strengths. Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads in Performance, Camera, Display. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads in Battery, Software.
The top differences are: Display Size (Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold advantage), Resolution (Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold advantage), Peak Brightness (Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone 16 Pro advantage), RAM (Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold advantage).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone 16 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 148,960 – Rs 301,000; PTA not entered. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: non-PTA approximately Rs 237,440; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
