Oppo Find X9 leads
by 7 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
Find X9 leads overall versus iPhone 16 Plus. Display: 62.8 vs 85.9.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
Best for users who prioritize build and software.
Oppo Find X9
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
29
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePixel Density
Panel Type
HDR Support
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Plus | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | 6.7"Better | 6.59" |
Resolution Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | 1290 x 2796Better | 1256 x 2760 |
Refresh Rate Oppo Find X9 leads | 60Hz | 120HzBetter |
Peak Brightness Oppo Find X9 leads | 2000 nits | 3600 nitsBetter |
Pixel Density Close match | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
Panel Type Close match | OLED | OLED |
HDR Support Close match | Yes | Yes |
Display Protection Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen)Better | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Plus | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
RAM Oppo Find X9 leads | 8GB | 16GBBetter |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
CPU Clock Different | 4.04GHz | 4.21GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 6 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x4.04GHz + 4x2.20GHz | 1x4.21GHz + 3x3.5GHz + 4x2.7GHz |
AnTuTu Score Needs more data | 1727276 | Not available |
Geekbench (Single) Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | 3300Better | 3264 |
Geekbench (Multi) Oppo Find X9 leads | 7927 | 9551Better |
Storage Oppo Find X9 leads | 512GB | 1024GBBetter |
Storage Type Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 4.1 |
Chipset Oppo Find X9 leads | Apple A18 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm)Better |
GPU Different | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Arm G1-Ultra |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceFront Video Resolution
Key differenceRear Aperture
Digital Zoom
Optical Image Stabilization
Max Video Resolution
Front Sensor
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Plus | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Oppo Find X9 leads | 48MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Oppo Find X9 leads | 48MP + 12MP | 50MP + 50MP + 50MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Oppo Find X9 leads | 1/1.56 | 1/1.4Better |
Rear Aperture Close match | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
Optical Zoom Oppo Find X9 leads | None (no telephoto) | 3xBetter |
Digital Zoom Needs more data | 10x | Not available |
Optical Image Stabilization Close match | Yes | Yes |
Max Video Resolution Close match | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG |
Front Camera Oppo Find X9 leads | 12MP | 32MPBetter |
Front Sensor Different | 12MP TrueDepth camera with autofocus | 32MP (1/2.74") |
Front Aperture Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | f/1.9Better | f/2.4 |
Front Video Resolution Apple iPhone 16 Plus leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EISBetter | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
Find X9 is the better choice overall. Key differences: Find X9 scores higher for camera (80.3 vs 72.8). Find X9 lasts longer on a charge (about 13h vs 12.2h of estimated screen-on time). However, iPhone 16 Plus may still suit your needs better depending on your priorities.
Find X9 scores higher overall than iPhone 16 Plus once each category is weighted. Chipset: Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) vs Apple A18 (3 nm) That makes Find X9 the safer all-round pick, though iPhone 16 Plus may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize build and software. iPhone 16 Plus offers strong performance in these areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. Find X9 excels in processing power and multitasking.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 16 Plus | Oppo Find X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 167,720 | ≈ Rs 365,960 |
| PTA | -- | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 16 Plus and Oppo Find X9 can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Oppo Find X9 scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Oppo Find X9 is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Apple iPhone 16 Plus advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone 16 Plus advantage), Refresh Rate (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Peak Brightness (Oppo Find X9 advantage), Display Protection (Apple iPhone 16 Plus advantage).
Oppo Find X9 delivers better camera performance overall.
Oppo Find X9 tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone 16 Plus: non-PTA approximately Rs 167,720; PTA not entered. Oppo Find X9: non-PTA approximately Rs 365,960; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
