Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads
by 20 points on overall. The category breakdown below shows where the gap comes from.
iPhone 13 Pro leads overall versus Galaxy A08 4G. Software: 18.7 vs 84.1.
Scoring profile: balanced
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera.
Samsung Galaxy A08 4G
Best for users who prioritize battery and software.
This is MyTechAdvisor's own independently compiled analysis, not the manufacturer's — it's provided for informational purposes only and isn't guaranteed to be complete or error-free. See our editorial policy.
Spec table
Start with the key differences, then expand a section to check the full specifications.
Visible rows
66
Meaningful differences
42
Layout
Full side-by-side mode
Display Size
Key differenceResolution
Key differenceRefresh Rate
Key differencePeak Brightness
Key differencePixel Density
Key differenceHDR Support
Key differenceDisplay Protection
Key differencePanel Type
| Specification | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G |
|---|---|---|
Display Size Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | 6.1" | 6.7"Better |
Resolution Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 1170 x 2532Better | 720 x 1600 |
Refresh Rate Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 120HzBetter | 90Hz |
Peak Brightness Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 1200 nitsBetter | 480 nits |
Pixel Density Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 457 ppiBetter | 262 ppi |
Panel Type Different | OLED | LCD |
HDR Support Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | YesBetter | No |
Display Protection Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | Ceramic Shield glassBetter | Glass (unspecified grade) |
RAM
Key differenceGeekbench (Single)
Key differenceGeekbench (Multi)
Key differenceStorage
Key differenceStorage Type
Key differenceChipset
Key differenceRAM Type
CPU Clock
CPU Cores
CPU Cluster Speeds
AnTuTu Score
GPU
| Specification | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G |
|---|---|---|
RAM Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 6GBBetter | 4GB |
RAM Type Close match | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
CPU Clock Different | 3.23GHz | 2.2GHz |
CPU Cores Different | 6 | 8 |
CPU Cluster Speeds Different | 2x3.23GHz + 4x1.82GHz | 2x2.2GHz + 6x2.0GHz |
AnTuTu Score Different | 794348 | 400000 |
Geekbench (Single) Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 2280Better | 720 |
Geekbench (Multi) Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 5550Better | 1950 |
Storage Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 1024GBBetter | 256GB |
Storage Type Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | NVMeBetter | UFS 2.2 |
Chipset Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm)Better | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
GPU Different | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Mali-G57 MC2 |
Rear Camera
Key differenceRear Camera (All Lenses)
Key differenceRear Sensor Size
Key differenceRear Aperture
Key differenceOptical Zoom
Key differenceOptical Image Stabilization
Key differenceMax Video Resolution
Key differenceFront Camera
Key differenceFront Aperture
Key differenceDigital Zoom
Front Sensor
Front Video Resolution
Camera Features
| Specification | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G |
|---|---|---|
Rear Camera Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | 12MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Camera (All Lenses) Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | 12MP + 12MP + 12MP | 50MPBetter |
Rear Sensor Size Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 1/1.7Better | 1/2.76 |
Rear Aperture Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | f/1.5Better | f/1.8 |
Optical Zoom Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 3xBetter | None (no telephoto) |
Digital Zoom Different | 5x | 10x |
Optical Image Stabilization Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | YesBetter | No |
Max Video Resolution Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10‑bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, stereo sound rec.Better | 1080p@30/60fps |
Front Camera Apple iPhone 13 Pro leads | 12MPBetter | 8MP |
Front Sensor Different | 12MP TrueDepth camera | 8MP 1/4.0" front camera |
Front Aperture Samsung Galaxy A08 4G leads | f/2.2 | f/2.0Better |
Front Video Resolution Different | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | Supported (resolution not published) |
Camera Features Different | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | LED flash |
iPhone 13 Pro is the better choice overall. Key differences: iPhone 13 Pro scores higher for camera (67.2 vs 40). Galaxy A08 4G lasts longer on a charge (about 9.5h vs 7.5h of estimated screen-on time). However, Galaxy A08 4G lasts longer on a charge.
iPhone 13 Pro scores higher overall than Galaxy A08 4G once each category is weighted. Chipset: Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) vs Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) That makes iPhone 13 Pro the safer all-round pick, though Galaxy A08 4G may lead in specific areas.
Best for users who prioritize performance and camera. iPhone 13 Pro excels in processing power and multitasking.
Best for users who need long battery life. Galaxy A08 4G provides extended usage with strong software.
Non-PTA
PTA
| Price | Apple iPhone 13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A08 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Non-PTA | ≈ Rs 50,400 – Rs 98,000 | -- |
| PTA | Rs 135,000 | -- |
≈ Converted from a fetched price. Store offers, when available, are listed separately.
Choosing between Apple iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A08 4G can be tough. This comparison breaks down performance, camera, battery, and listed pricing so you can decide faster.
We focus on practical differences that impact daily use, not just spec sheet noise.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro scores higher overall once each category is weighted, making it the safer all‑round pick.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is the better choice overall, winning in 4 key categories.
The top differences are: Display Size (Samsung Galaxy A08 4G advantage), Resolution (Apple iPhone 13 Pro advantage), Refresh Rate (Apple iPhone 13 Pro advantage), Peak Brightness (Apple iPhone 13 Pro advantage), Pixel Density (Apple iPhone 13 Pro advantage).
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has the stronger camera setup for photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A08 4G tends to last longer on a charge.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro: non-PTA approximately Rs 50,400 – Rs 98,000; PTA Rs 135,000. Samsung Galaxy A08 4G: non-PTA not available; PTA not entered. These are phone reference prices, not optional store offers.
Use our phone finder for a personalized recommendation.
